🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding that comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {